Home / News / Tucker Carlson grills Trump on wiretapping tweets: Why not ‘gather all the evidence’ yourself?

Tucker Carlson grills Trump on wiretapping tweets: Why not ‘gather all the evidence’ yourself?

tucker carlsonScreenshot/Fox

During an talk on Wednesday, Fox News’ Tucker Carlson
grilled President Donald Trump over his bomb wiretapping
allegations intended against President Barack Obama, asking why
Trump couldn’t accumulate the justification himself, if such evidence
existed, when “every comprehension group reports to you.”

Trump tweeted progressing this month, but presenting evidence,
that Obama had Trump Tower’s “wires tapped” during the
presidential campaign.

“Fifty-one thousand people retweeted that,” Carlson said. “So a
lot of people suspicion that was plausible. They trust you.
You’re the boss — you’re in charge of the agencies. Every
comprehension group reports to you. Why not immediately go to
them and accumulate justification to support that?”

The White House expelled a matter shortly after Trump leveled
the accusations “requesting that … the congressional
comprehension committees practice their slip management to
establish either executive bend inquisitive powers were
abused in 2016.”

Many experts have said, however, that Trump could find out
immediately if a aver had been obtained by the Obama
administration to surveil Trump Tower. There is no indication
that the White House has directly asked the FBI either that
aver exists.

Trump told Carlson that he didn’t “want to do anything that’s
going to violate any strength of an agency.”

“We have adequate problems,” he said. “We will be submitting
certain things, and we will be maybe speaking about this next
week, but it’s right now before the committee, and we consider we want
to leave it. we have a lot of certainty in the committee.”

The authority of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Devin
Nunes of California, on Wednesday
pronounced the cabinet had not found any evidence
to support
Trump’s explain that Obama had Trump Tower’s phones tapped.

Carlson doubled down, asking since Trump wouldn’t have waited “to
twitter about it until you can infer it.”

“Don’t you amalgamate your difference when you can’t yield evidence?”
Carlson asked.

Trump pronounced he tweeted the indictment since he had review about
wiretapping in The New York Times and listened Fox News anchor Bret
Baier “mention the word ‘wiretap.'”

“Well, since The New York Times wrote about it,” Trump said.
“Not that we honour The New York Times. we call it the ‘failing
New York Times.’ But they did write on Jan 20 using the word

The New York Times
reported on Jan 19
that the FBI, the National Security
Agency, and the CIA were questioning probable links between
Trump associates and Russian officials formed partly on
intercepted communications that had been obtained via
wiretapping. The Times did not report that Obama had systematic the
wiretapping, or that the wiretapping had directly targeted Trump

Instead, Trump’s tweets seemed to have been formed mostly on a

Breitbart article
that had been
placed in his reading pile
before he tweeted. The article
formed its claims on a speculation floated by the regressive radio
horde Mark Levin that Obama had mounted a “silent coup” against
Trump using “police state” strategy that enclosed wiretapping.

Carlson again told Trump that he was the boss and therefore
had “the ability to accumulate all the evidence” he wanted.

“I do. we do. But we consider that, frankly, we have a lot right now,”
Trump said. “And we consider if you watch — if you watched Bret Baier
and what he was saying, and what he was articulate about, and how he
mentioned the word ‘wiretap,’ you would feel very assured that
you could discuss the name. He mentioned it. And other people
have mentioned it.”

Trump pronounced that in the tweet, the difference “wires tapped” were in
quotes. White House press secretary Sean Spicer pronounced last week
that Trump meant the Obama administration had been surveilling
him generally, not that “President Obama went up and tapped his
phone personally.”

“Don’t forget, when we contend wiretapping, those difference were in
quotes,” Trump told Carlson. “That really covers — because
wiretapping is flattering out-of-date stuff, but that really covers
notice and many other things. And nobody ever talks about
the fact that it was in quotes, but that’s a very important
thing. But wiretap covers a lot of opposite things. we think
you’re going to find some very engaging equipment coming to the
forefront over the next two weeks.”

Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence
Committee, pronounced Wednesday that he had “seen no justification of
illegality of any electronic surveillance” and that “there was no
piece to the indictment that President Obama wiretapped Trump

Nunes, the House comprehension chair, pronounced FBI Director James
Comey had still not told the cabinet directly either the
business had sought and obtained a aver under the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act to surveil anyone who competence have
communicated with Trump associates during the campaign. Nunes
pronounced Comey had concluded to attest at a open House Intelligence
Committee conference next week about the FBI’s review into
Russia’s nosiness in the 2016 election.

The FBI also briefed the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, the chair of the Senate Judiciary
Committee’s subcommittee on crime and terrorism,
told the FBI
on Tuesday that it would “screw
up big time
” if it unsuccessful to respond to his subcommittee’s
minute asking for “copies of any aver applications and court
orders” associated to any wiretaps of Trump.

Check Also

Alabama Democrat Doug Jones projected to win Senate special election in major upset

Democratic claimant for U.S. Senate Doug Jones stands with his wife Louise as he speaks …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *